Topic: Borland Delphi也算OO language?那PB也算咯??@@ @费城华人论坛:费城枫下论坛 The Rolia Forum of Philadelphia

工作学习 / IT杂谈 / Borland Delphi也算OO language?那PB也算咯??@@ -antmm(明天你会不会来...); 2002-1-23 (#344422@0)

大姐,学C++没会，改BC/Delphi...Delphi不是OO还有什么是OO?JavaBean的设计spec是基于Inprise Componenet 小组的...懂了吗？！别说Delphi坏话，保证一大陀人s跟你急！ -ra95(C&C); 2002-1-23 (#344507@0)

谢谢指教啊, Delphi没用过, 只用过PB, 觉得PFC什么的甚是好用, 觉得也挺象OO的, 用过Delphi的DX说和PB差不多, 却没想过两者还是有区别的. -antmm(明天你会不会来...); 2002-1-23 (#344816@0)

对于OO的三大特征，封装，继承，多态，pb哪点少了？只是它主要是开发基于数据库的应用，底层应用pb的的确是太差了，但不能说它不是面向OO的当然严格地说pb是指一个开发工具，power script才是pb所用的language -rabbitbug(该死的ETS&Toefl); 2002-1-23 {64} (#344835@0)

多态? For example? May PB above v4.0 is OO. -tianqi21(tian); 2002-1-23 (#344861@0)

Scare you: Do you happen to know vFoxpro is also OO! -siebel(Siebel); 2002-1-23 (#344713@0)

眼瞪那么大干嘛? 当然是啦, 还有Acess啥的也是. 判断OOP的基本原则: 事件驱动和属性包装. -mjs(臭豆腐-在痛苦中挣扎); 2002-1-23 (#344744@0)

哈, 错, Component不是的编程方法.而应是一个软件接口. 看看COM的定义:The Component Object Model (COM) is a component software architecture that allows applications and systems to be built from components supplied by different software vendors.COM is the underlying architecture that forms the foundation for higher-level software services, like those provided by OLE. OLE services span various aspects of component software, including compound documents, custom controls, inter-application scripting, data transfer, and other software interactions -mjs(臭豆腐-在痛苦中挣扎); 2002-1-23 {478} (#344964@0)

comp is a spec. The software entity developed by it is a "component". 事件驱动和属性包装 is an important concept of component which follows OO's 封装.... am i right? so it's 判断OOP的基本原则... -ra95(C&C); 2002-1-23 (#345024@0)

Delphi是基本Pascal语言的。最早的Pascal不是OO的，但现在的叫OOPascal. 现在VB.Net都OO了 -miketany(MIKE老狼); 2002-1-23 (#344790@0)
呵呵,满大街都是OO了 -alanwang99(alan); 2002-1-23 (#344860@0)

Delphi当然是OOP, 只是你感觉不那末明显。如果你去读项目中的一个文件（记不清了）就会发现。 -bigsquirrel(小松鼠); 2002-1-23 (#345014@0)
Delphi当然是OO的，Pascal 6.0就已经是OO的了 -guest2002(guest2002); 2002-1-24 (#345545@0)
jdk 1.2和 java 2主要是由Borland开发的，sun只挂名而已。不信你看java类库是不是和vcl很象 -guest2002(guest2002); 2002-1-24 (#345561@0)

borland 公司有一些天才, 永远走在技术的最前列. 他们在与一个世界上最强大的对手在作战, 能生存到今天就足以说明它的实力. 虽然他们总是最先推出, 但随后抄袭跟出却更加全面的microsoft总是笑到最后. sigh! -kevin2000(流星雨-明明白白折腾); 2002-1-24 (#345568@0)
really? can me show me the evidence? -blaise(); 2002-1-24 (#345577@0)

Delphi其实和Java很相似的！他们的类的结构，包的封装，访问特性等！ -thinhair(thinhair); 2002-1-24 (#345569@0)
我的面向对象程序观 (transfer) -fxue(fxue); 2002-1-24 {8162} (#345662@0)

精彩,好文! :-)) -flying_snow(飞雪浮冰); 2002-1-24 (#345672@0)
同感同感。以前用c，一直以为c++和C很相似。真正理解面向对象编程还是学了Java之后，原来C++和C完全不同啊。但仍感觉C++有些乱，不像JAVA简洁明了。有一位编程多年的朋友说：用C写出来程序后有一种窃喜的感觉，用其它语言就没有了。 -miketany(MIKE老狼); 2002-1-24 (#345734@0)

哈哈, 当初用C, 用ACSII符话了第一个Window, 并编了几个控制Window的函数后, 那个得意感......... 想想就美. -mjs(臭豆腐-在痛苦中挣扎); 2002-1-24 (#345760@0)

给你一段java newbie code. :) 大家有很亲切的感觉吧;)class GirlA
{
public static void do() {...};
}
class GirlB
{
public static void do() {...};
}
class GirlC
{
public static void do() {...};
}
class FuckAll
{
public static void fuck()
{
GirlA.do();
GirlB.do();
GirlC.do();
}
} -ra95(C&C); 2002-1-24 {248} (#345758@0)
?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????C++??????????????????????????????????????JAVA????????????????????????????????Int, ??????Int?????????????????JAVA??????????????????????????????????????
????????????????java????????C++?????????JAVA??template?????java???????????? -dannyp(Danny); 2002-1-30 {284} (#352391@0)

@Philadelphia