本文发表在 rolia.net 枫下论坛选前几位原因如下：

#1 Brad Trost：

Pros:
<Economy>
Promises to lower payroll tax, income tax, and the capital gains tax (1)
Believes Canada should renegotiate NAFTA quickly and professionally to ensure Canada is prioritized over Mexico and China (1)
Would reduce the federal deficit by growing the economy, limiting government spending, working closely with the US, eliminating corporate welfare, and eliminating funding for the CBC (1)
Plans to negotiate with the provinces to eliminate trade barriers (1)
Believes TPP is dead, so Canada should focus on trade with traditional partners like Great Britain and Japan (1)
Supports Energy East to create jobs (2)
Promises to make use of Canada’s natural resources, including oil and shale gas, to grow the economy (2)
<Immigration>
Believes immigration policy should be built on Canada’s economic needs (1)
Argues that Canada should select immigrants “who choose Canada, not those use Canada, so we can put Canada first” (1)
Would make immigration policy more local to allow regions to be flexible about foreign workers (2)
Promises to halt immigration from “pro-radical Islam” regions (3)
Plans to attract immigrants by growing the economy, and believes immigration will contribute to economic growth (2)
Believes Canada can integrate immigrants without large government spending if it uses private partnerships and accepts immigrants with ready-to-use skills (1)



#2 Maxime Bernier

Pros:
<Economy>
Would make the first budget an “investment budget,” which would lower small business taxes, reduce corporate tax from 15% to 10%,
Promises to end corporate welfare, which he argues would save $16B/year and offset lost revenues from lowering taxes (1, 2, 3).
Would balance the budget by cutting and limiting government spending, and by privatizing airports and Canada Post (1, 2)
<Immigration>
Believes immigration policies should be tied to the economic interests of our country (1, 3)
More resources should go to security screening agencies

Cons:
abolish the capital gains tax (1, 2)
Believes the private sector should be the driver behind opportunities for new immigrants (3)


#3 Andrew Scheer

Pros:
<Economy>
Would reject carbon taxes and payroll taxes as well as reduce corporate tax to attract international business (1, 3)
Promises to prioritize job creation by spending money at home instead of abroad, minimizing government spending, and stimulating the private sector (1)
Plans to implement an internal Free Trade Act to ensure that goods and skilled workers can move freely (1)
Supports TPP (1)
Believes Canada should put pressure on US industry to ensure the President agrees with free trade as well (1)
Supports pipeline construction to transport resources and create jobs (2)
Would prioritize Canadian workers over temporary foreign workers in times of high unemployment (2)
<Immigration>
Argues that Canada should focus on security and the integration of immigrants (3)
Believes that immigration offsets Canada’s small population to help grow the economy (1,3)
Promises to fix immigration levels based on economic indicators of what Canadian society needs (1)
Would focus on ensuring that immigrants “embrace what makes Canada great” (1)
Plans to work with provinces and NGOs to assist in transitioning new immigrants (1)
Promises to close loopholes for illegitimate refugees to Canada from the US border (4)

Cons:
Less experienced;


#4 Kelly Leitch
Pros:
<Economy>
Cap government spending, grow private sector, reduce tax for middle low/income family;
Eliminate domestic trade barriers; Negotiate NAFTA;
<Immigration>
Immigration policy to protect Canadian values;

Cons:
Less detailed plans;
Abolish CBC ?

5~10名也都是大致比较了一下理念，及是否有具体的计划。

首先排除了Michael Chong, Depppak Obhrai, Kevin O'Leary。头两位支持或默认Motion 103；后面那位居然说过，你与山羊结合也无所谓，这种伦理观，与我相差甚远。

各候选人大致情况参考各位网友提供的信息，及如下网站:更多精彩文章及讨论，请光临枫下论坛 rolia.net